Pre-emptive veno-arterial ECMO in a giant compressive goiter-related difficult airway: A case report.

A 64-year-old patient required emergency surgery with high risk of intubation failure, without any possibility to perform neither a direct transtracheal access nor VV-ECMO canulation. The patient was managed thanks to a VA-ECMO despite the absence of cardiac function impairment. This report describes perioperative challenges and management of this unconventional case with favorable outcome.

Use of Aprotinin versus Tranexamic Acid in Cardiac Surgery Patients with High-Risk for Excessive Bleeding (APACHE) trial: a multicentre retrospective comparative non-randomized historical study.

OBJECTIVES: Following the reintroduction of aprotinin into the European market, the French Society of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anaesthesiologists recommended its prophylactic use at half-dose for high-risk cardiac surgery patients. We examined whether the use of aprotinin instead of tranexamic acid could significantly reduce severe perioperative bleeding. METHODS: This multicentre, retrospective, historical study included cardiac surgery patients treated with aprotinin or tranexamic acid between December 2017 and September 2020. The primary efficacy end point was the severe or massive perioperative bleeding (class 3-4 of the universal definition of perioperative bleeding). The safety secondary end points included the occurrence of thromboembolic events and all-cause mortality within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: Among the 693 patients included in the study, 347 received aprotinin and 346 took tranexamic acid. The percentage of patients with severe or massive bleeding was similar in the 2 groups (42.1% vs 43.6%, Adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.23, P = 0.44), as was the perioperative need for blood products (81.0% vs 83.2%, ORadj = 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.48-1.17, P = 0.20). However, the median (Interquartile range) 12 h postoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the aprotinin group (383 ml [241-625] vs 450 ml [290-730], P < 0.01). Compared to tranexamic acid, the intraoperative use of aprotinin was associated with increased risk for thromboembolic events (adjusted Hazard ratio 2.30 [95% Cl: 1.06-5.30]; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Given the modest reduction in blood loss at the expense of a significant increase in thromboembolic adverse events, aprotinin use in high-risk cardiac surgery patients should be based on a carefully considered benefit-risk assessment.

Cangrelor for cardiopulmonary bypass in delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a case report.

Background: Anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in cases of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is challenging as no convenient and proven alternative, such as heparin alone, exists. A "platelet anesthesia" concept using antiplatelet agent cangrelor with heparin has been successfully reported in this setting. Key Clinical Question: In cases of acute HIT, is CPB with cangrelor plus heparin effective and safe?. Clinical Approach: We report the case of a patient who developed, 2 weeks after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure, a delayed-onset HIT complicated with carotid, popliteal, and PFO device thromboses that could not be controlled by argatroban anticoagulation and required urgent cardiac surgery. CPB for PFO occluder removal and popliteal thrombectomy were performed using cangrelor with heparin without complication. Neither a new thromboembolic event nor abnormal bleeding was noticed in the postoperative period. Conclusion: CPB using cangrelor with heparin seems to be an effective alternative for acute HIT.

A randomized controlled trial of the intraoperative use of noninvasive ventilation versus supplemental oxygen by face mask for procedural sedation in an electrophysiology laboratory.

PURPOSE: The efficacy of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) during procedures that require sedation and analgesia has not been established. We evaluated whether NIV reduces the incidence of respiratory events. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, we included 195 patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status of III or IV during electrophysiology laboratory procedures. We compared NIV with face mask oxygen therapy for patients under sedation. The primary outcome was the incidence of respiratory events determined by a computer-driven blinded analysis and defined by hypoxemia (peripheral oxygen saturation < 90%) or apnea/hypopnea (absence of breathing for 20 sec on capnography). Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic variables, sedation, patient safety (composite scores of major or minor adverse events), and adverse outcomes at day 7. RESULTS: A respiratory event occurred in 89/98 (95%) patients in the NIV group and in 69/97 (73%) patients with face masks (risk ratio [RR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13 to 1.47; P < 0.001). Hypoxemia occurred in 40 (42%) patients in the NIV group and in 33 (34%) patients with face masks (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.74; P = 0.30). Apnea/hypopnea occurred in 83 patients (92%) in the NIV group vs 65 patients (70%) with face masks (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.53; P < 0.001). Hemodynamic variables, sedation, major or minor safety events, and patient outcomes were not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory events were more frequent among patients receiving NIV without any safety or outcome impairment. These results do not support the routine use of NIV intraoperatively. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02779998); registered 4 November 2015.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'efficacité de la ventilation non invasive (VNI) pendant les interventions nécessitant une sédation et une analgésie n'a pas été établie. Nous avons évalué si la VNI réduisait l'incidence des complications respiratoires. MéTHODE: Dans cette étude randomisée contrôlée, nous avons inclus 195 patient·es de statut physique III ou IV selon l'American Society of Anesthesiologists pendant des interventions en laboratoire d'électrophysiologie. Nous avons comparé la VNI à l'oxygénothérapie par masque facial pour les patient·es sous sédation. Le critère d'évaluation principal était l'incidence des complications respiratoires déterminée par une analyse en aveugle assistée par ordinateur et définie par une hypoxémie (saturation périphérique en oxygène < 90 %) ou une apnée/hypopnée (absence de respiration pendant 20 secondes à la capnographie). Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient les variables hémodynamiques, la sédation, la sécurité des patient·es (scores composites des événements indésirables majeurs ou mineurs) et les issues indésirables au jour 7. RéSULTATS: Un événement respiratoire est survenu chez 89/98 (95 %) patient·es du groupe VNI et chez 69/97 (73 %) patient·es ayant un masque facial (risque relatif [RR], 1,29; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 1,13 à 1,47; P < 0,001). Une hypoxémie est survenue chez 40 (42 %) patient·es du groupe VNI et chez 33 (34 %) patient·es ayant un masque facial (RR, 1,21 ; IC à 95 %, 0,84 à 1,74; P = 0,30). Une hypoxémie est survenue chez 40 (42 %) patient·es du groupe VNI et chez 33 (34 %) patient·es ayant un masque facial (RR, 1,21; IC 95 %, 0,84 à 1,74; P = 0,30). Les variables hémodynamiques, la sédation, les événements de sécurité majeurs ou mineurs et les issues pour les patient·es n'étaient pas différents entre les groupes. CONCLUSION: Les complications respiratoires étaient plus fréquentes chez les patient·es recevant une VNI sans aucun impact sur la sécurité ou les issues. Ces résultats n'appuient pas l'utilisation systématique de la VNI en peropératoire. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02779998); enregistrée le 4 novembre 2015.

Helpfulness of the liver disease scores in cardiac surgery for cirrhotic patients.

OBJECTIVES: Liver cirrhosis is a well-known risk factor of mortality after cardiac surgery, but not considered in the widely used EuroSCOREII (ESII). The objective was to analyse the performance of the ESII, the Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) and the Model of End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores to predict hospital mortality in cardiac surgery for cirrhotic patients and to analyse the survival according to the preoperative cirrhosis status. METHODS: Preoperative and cirrhosis characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared according to hospital mortality. The performance of the 3 scores was analysed by the area under the receiver-operating characteristics (AUC-ROC) by DeLong's method. The survival of the patients who were discharged was analysed by Kaplan-Meier curves according to the preoperative cirrhosis status. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included. Observed hospital mortality was 12%, the predictive mortality by ESII was 3.9% ± 5.2%, and AUC-ROC was 0.67 [0.44-0.90]. Only the MELD score was discriminant (AUC-ROC 0.75 [0.57-0.93]). The observed hospital mortality increased by threefold over the ESII (12% versus 3.9%, p < 0.001), except the patients with MELD < 10 for whom hospital mortality was similar as ESII (3% versus 2.6%, p = 0.89). Long-term survival was higher for the MELD < 10 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The ESII did not predict hospital mortality after a cardiac surgery in cirrhotic patients and the MELD score should be considered for decision of cardiac intervention in cirrhotic patients.

The Atrial Flow Regulator: A Novel Device for Left Ventricular Unloading in Patients Receiving Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support?

Severe pulmonary edema, secondary to left ventricular afterload increment, is a common problem occurring in patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. No consensus is currently available for its management, but several devices/procedures have been described, including an Impella device (Abiomed), balloon atrial septostomy, intraaortic balloon counterpulsation, or an additional venous cannula, as possible adjuncts. We report the feasibility and efficacy of the atrial flow regulator device (Occlutech) for left ventricular unloading in a 58-year-old patient receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. However, the benefits of this device relative to simple balloon atrial septostomy need to be further investigated.

Comparison of the additive, logistic european system for cardiac operative risk (EuroSCORE) with the EuroSCORE 2 to predict mortality in high-risk cardiac surgery.

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the new EuroSCORE (ES) 2 prediction model in high-risk patients with the 2 other oldest additive ES (aES) and logistic ES (lES). Methods: Consecutive adult patients undergoing all cardiac surgery except heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device were included. The 3 risk scores were collected before surgery. We defined 4 high-risk groups of patients, patients ≥80 years, combined cardiac surgery, surgery of the thoracic aorta, and emergency cardiac surgery, and 2 low-risk groups, valve surgery and coronary artery bypass surgery. The predicted value of each score has been assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). Results: The study had included 3301 patients. Thirty-day mortality was 3.9% (95% confidence interval (CI), 3.3 - 4.6%). The AUC of ES2 was 0.81 (0.77 - 0.84), 0.82 (0.78 - 0.85), 0.70 (0.64 - 0.76), 0.79 (0.74 - 0.83), 0.85 (0.83 - 0.87), and 0.88 (0.86 - 0.90) for octogenarians, thoracic aortic surgery, combined surgery, emergency surgery, coronary surgery, and valve surgery, respectively. These ES2 AUC values were higher than those obtained with the aES for octogenarians, and with the lES for octogenarians and valve surgery. The ES2 calibration was better than the aES and lES calibration for the whole population, and low-risk groups. The ES2 calibration was superior to aES and lES in high-risk groups, except for octogenarians and thoracic aortic surgery compared to lES. Conclusion: In high-risk cardiac surgery patients, ES2 only marginally improve the predicted 30-day mortality in comparison to other ES.

Oesophageal Doppler to optimize intraoperative haemodynamics during prone position. A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative use of oesophageal Doppler (OD) was associated with improved postoperative outcomes through the optimization of perioperative fluid management. We studied the effect on haemodynamics of a goal-directed fluid management approach, guided by OD, during elective spine surgery in the prone position. METHODS: Intraoperative fluid and vasopressor administration were directed according to one of two randomly chosen decision-making algorithms driven by either OD (OD group; n=33 patients) or standard parameters (standard group; n=34 patients). Both groups were monitored by OD, however haemodynamics management in the standard group was blinded to OD information. OD algorithm used corrected flow time as the primary variable to guide haemodynamics management. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was maintained within 75% of the preoperative value for both groups. The primary outcome was the duration of intraoperative hypotensive episodes during prone position. RESULTS: The proportion of procedure duration with MAP below the predefined threshold was greater in the Standard group than in the OD group: 34% (15-62) (median, interquartile range) versus 17% (5-35) of the observation period, respectively (P=0.01). They were also more frequent in the Standard group: 7 (3-11) per patient versus 3 (1-7) per patient (P<0.001). The requirement and dosing of ephedrine and infused colloids over the observation period did not significantly differ between the two groups. The OD parameters were comparable between the two groups during prone position. CONCLUSION: OD monitoring during spine surgery in prone position is feasible and may help physicians to reduce the duration of hypotensive episodes during this surgical procedure.

Anaesthesiological support in a cardiac electrophysiology laboratory: a single-centre prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has greatly increased during the last decade and anaesthetic management of these patients remains an open question. OBJECTIVE: This study describes anaesthetic management and risk factors associated with complications occurring during these procedures. DESIGN: A single-centre prospective observational study. SETTING: Grenoble University Hospital, France, from May 2010 to October 2010. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the cardiac electrophysiology laboratory were included. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical data, anaesthetic and medical characteristics as well as complications (respiratory or cardiovascular) and treatment were recorded by the anaesthetic nurse at the end of each procedure. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-nine patients were included, 229 (85%) with an American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) status of 3 or 4, 103 (38%) with a New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class of 3 or 4 and 136 (51%) with a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 40%. Two hundred and forty-seven (92%) of the patients underwent deep sedation and 12 (8%) general anaesthesia. Seventy-eight (29%) patients had at least one complication, among whom 21 (27%) had at least one considered as severe. Fifty (19%) of the patients had a respiratory complication and 46 (17%) a cardiovascular complication; the latter was more frequently severe (41 vs. 12%; P=0.001). Lead extraction [odds ratio (OR) 13.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.5 to 53.3; P<0.001], NYHA status of 4 (OR 11.8, 95% CI 1.8 to 74.8; P<0.001), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) testing by T-wave shock (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.53 to 10.2; P=0.005) and length of procedure (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.004 to 1.031; P=0.013) were identified as independent risk factors for cardiovascular complications. CONCLUSION: Patients requiring cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation were fragile with a high complication rate and a high rate of severe complications even with anaesthesiological support. These complications, as well as the need for deep sedation or general anaesthesia, clearly justify the involvement of a qualified anaesthesiologist.

Evaluation of the effect of one large dose of erythropoietin against cardiac and cerebral ischemic injury occurring during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study.

Cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) induce ischemia-reperfusion and subsequent cellular injury with inflammatory reaction. Clinical and experimental studies suggest that recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) independently of its erythropoietic effect may be used as a cytoprotective agent against ischemic injury. We tested the hypothesis that one large dose of EPO administered shortly before CPB prevents the elevation of cardiac and cerebral ischemic blood markers as well as the systemic inflammatory response induced by cardiac surgery with CBP through this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot trial. Fifty patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with CPB were randomly allocated to EPO or control groups. EPO (800 IU/kg intravenously) or placebo (saline) was administered before CPB. The primary end point was to study the effect of EPO administration on several blood markers of myocardial and cerebral ischemia in relation to CABG with CPB. In both groups, surgery increased plasma concentrations of cardiac (troponin T, NT-proBNP, and creatine kinase MB) and cerebral (S100ß protein) markers ischemic as well as the pro-inflammatory marker interleukin-6. Compared with the placebo, EPO administration before CPB did not prevent an increase of all these markers following CPB. In conclusion, one large dose of EPO, given shortly before CPB, did not protect against cardiac and cerebral ischemia and inflammatory response occurring during CABG surgery with CPB. Although the long-term clinical implications remain unknown, the findings do not support use of EPO at this dose as a cytoprotective agent in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.